Nicolas Sarkozy vient d’être écroué à la prison de la Santé pour purger une peine de cinq ans de prison ferme pour association de malfaiteurs : il arrive que la justice puisse ressembler à la Justice. Cela nous étonne car même Carla ne saurait s'y attendre. C'est tellement insolite... et inquiétant pour l'État de Droite.
D'ailleurs, tout est clair quand le perroquet officiel BHL débite en même temps qu’il n’y a ni famine ni génocide à Gaza et, vis-à-vis de Sarko : « j’ai toujours eu l’intime conviction qu’il n’est pas coupable ». Coupables sont les oliviers de Gaza.
Et donc, voilà que Marie Reno en profite et donne un p'tit sacré cours de français aux voix cafardeuses...
« La prison de Sarkozy, ça méritait de parodier Carla Bruni » —dit Marie Reno, qui pastiche la manière mais répercute à rebours son quolibet inexorable, déflagration tranquille contre un contempteur du laxisme des juges :
Il était persuadé
qu'il n'risquait pas grand-chose
que dans tous ses procès
il obtiendrait gain de cause
lui qui toujours voulait
que tout le monde aille en prison
maintenant qu'il y est
il a l'air un peu con.
Mais Carla lui a dit que
les juges avaient tort
C'est Carla qui a dit que
les juges avaient tort !
Serait-ce possible alors ?
Il peut toujours compter
sur des ex-taulards
pour le conseiller
sur la vie au mitard
C'est quand-même bien pratique
d'avoir comme bon poto
un certain "Patrick"
Qui n'paye pas ses impôts !
Balkany lui a dit
qu'il fallait faire du sport
C'est Balkany qui a dit
qu'il fallait faire du sport
et des p'tits tours dehors !
Au parloir Carla
lui chantera des chansons
de sa petite voix
qui fiche le bourdon
Louis, ce petit ange,
lui apportera des fruits :
en guise d'oranges
des mangues de Colombie !
C'est le p'tit Louis qui a dit
"Je manifeste dehors"
avec ses p'tits amis
il crie encore et encore
"Mon papa, c'est le plus fort !"
Aujourd'hui, c'est Sarko
qu'on met en prison
peut-^tre que bientôt
ce sera le tour de Macron !
On trouvera de la place
même pour Bruno Le Maire,
suffira d'une paillasse
ou d'un matelas par terre !
C'est le peuple qui vous dit
d'aller manger vos morts !
C'est le peuple qui vous dit
d'aller manger vos morts !
On sera tranquilles alors !
Al paso que vamos, dentro de poco enseñar
los Derechos Humanos será apología del terrorismo.
(Commentaire d'un lecteur d'un journal en Espagne)
Voilà : il n'y a pas qu'aux États-Unis, le Royaume-Uni ou l'Allemagne que ça se passe... En France aussi.
Le 14.10.2025, la Fédération internationale des ligues des droits de l'Homme (FIDH) —en collaboration avec la Ligue des droits de l'Homme (LDH), le Centre pour les droits constitutionnels (CCR) et le Comité d'administration de la justice (CAJ), a publié un rapport complet documentant la répression systématique des mouvements de solidarité avec la Palestine en France, en Allemagne, au Royaume-Uni et aux États-Unis. Ce rapport révèle des violations alarmantes des libertés fondamentales en réponse au plaidoyer pro-palestinien.
Intitulé Criminalisation and Narrative Control: Solidarity with Palestine in the Crosshairs (Solidarity as a Crime: Voices for Palestine Under Fire / « La solidarité comme crime : Les voix de la Palestine sous le feu des critiques »), il examine comment les gouvernements ont instrumentalisé les discours antiterroristes et les accusations d'antisémitisme pour réprimer la dissidence, museler la solidarité et criminaliser le soutien aux droits des Palestiniens depuis le 7 octobre 2023. Les gouvernements ont la scélératesse de mêler délibérément antisémitisme et critiques d'Israël pour justifier l’étouffement de ceux qui dénoncent le génocide israélien ou plaident en faveur d'un cessez-le-feu en Palestine.
Middle East Eye, 15.10.2025
The UK…, Germany…, the US…, France...
Four democracies once seen as champions of free speech, now all accused of criminalizing dissent.
A new report by the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) has found that the right to protest is under sustained attack across the West.
Governments are weaponizing counter-terror laws and even the fight against Anti-semitism to silence those who speak up for Palestine, the report finds. And it's happening everywhere.
In Germany, police have violently broken up peaceful pro Palestine rallies. Protesters dragged away, flags torn from their hands, chants banned.
Authorities insist they're simply preserving order, but critics say a nation still scarred by its past is now using that history to justify silencing anti-genocide voices.
And in Britain, from the start of the genocide in 2023, then Home Secretary Suella Braverman called pro-Palestine marches ‘hate marches’.
Her tenure saw the expansion of police powers, making it easier to detain and search demonstrators. And then even after a change in government, little change —and perhaps things got a bit worse.
Palestine Action, a prominent activist group which took direct action to oppose the genocide was banned, with those protesting against the prescription arrested in their hundreds. And to top it all off, the new Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, [“renewing” Britain], called pro Palestine protests “un-British” —linking them to extremism, even as the UK continued selling weapon parts used to kill children in Israel's genocide on Gaza.
Jewish activists warn this crackdown is fuelling division, not safety.
Zoe Cohen (Jewish activist): "It's anti-Jewish racism. They all either say directly, or give us the pretence of, that all Jews are of one mind, and that is offensive. It's deeply offensive! because it's making out that all Jews completely support Israel, are all Zionists and support the genocide."
And across the Atlantic, the United States has seen thousands arrested at pro-Palestine protests: students expelled, professors investigated.
And in France, the government banned all pro Palestine demonstrations in October 2023, declaring them a threat to public order.
Since then, politicians have been interrogated under anti-terror laws simply for waving a Palestinian flag or posting messages of support.
And these aren't isolated incidents. They're part of a wider pattern where criticism of Israel is recast as extremism, where speaking out against a genocide becomes hate speech, and where governments that preach democracy seem to be eroding its foundation.
This report concludes that Western democracies are eroding the very freedom they claim to defend. Because if freedom to speak freely ends where a genocide begins, then it was never freedom to begin with, was it?
Côté France, Blast met du sien, fait un peu d'histoire et analyse ce crime légal. Son émission Légitime défense, proposée par Elsa Marcel et Eugénie Mérieau, du 14.10.2025, porte sur la répression et les représailles que la Macronie réserve à ceux/celles qui dénoncent le génocide perpétré par Israël en Palestine et/ou soutiennent la cause palestinienne, voire n'en peuvent plus de voir massacrer et affamer des gens incarcérés sous un ciel ouvert plafonné par avions, hélicoptères et drones pilonnant à tout moment.
Pensons au procès, juste cette année, d'Anasse Kazib (Révolution Permanente), de l'eurodéputée Emma Fourreau, d'Elias d’Imzalène, d'Olivia Zémor, sept militants d’Extinction Rebellion (mouvement international de désobéissance civile en lutte contre l’effondrement écologique et le dérèglement climatique)... La tentative de licenciement du syndicaliste Timothée Esprit par l'entreprise récidiviste Toray s'inscrit dans la même lame de fond.
Une figure juridique aussi sérieuse que la « provocation à la haine raciale » [le délit d'Incitation à la haine, à la violence ou à la discrimination] est utilisée par des suprémacistes blancs complices de génocide contre des manifestants antiracistes qui signalent les génocidaires et prônent la protection de leurs victimes. Ce sont les défenseurs des Droits de l'Homme blanc et plutôt riche contre les damnés de la terre. C'est la République des forts contre les faibles. Grâce à ce monstre juridique, le régime vise à réprimer et intimider, à glacer les chats échaudés...
Depuis plus de deux ans, on assiste à la criminalisation systématique et brutale du mouvement de solidarité avec la Palestine. Une mobilisation massive des infractions « d’apologie du terrorisme » et de « provocation à la haine raciale » pour restreindre significativement le débat public. Cette criminalisation ne date pas d’hier. Depuis les lois scélérates adoptées pour réprimer le mouvement anarchiste à la fin du 19ème siècle, le délit d'opinion a toujours été un outil redoutable pour s'attaquer à la solidarité anti-impérialiste. Quelle analyse en tirer ? Comment y résister ? C’est ce que nous verrons dans ce premier épisode de Légitime Défense écrit et animé par l’avocate Elsa Marcel et la constitutionnaliste Eugénie Mérieau.
Blast : Palestine : quand dénoncer un génocide devient un crime
Me echan una cariñosa bronca y me dicen que escriba en castellano y, leyendo un artículo de mi amigo Joaquín Rábago en lacasademitia, me viene solo el tema. Basta juntar con rapidez algunas notas sobre un fenómeno importante que formatea el mundo y del que tenemos ilustración gracias a periodistas e investigadores tenaces y admirables o a orgullosos portavoces del poder. Y es que los procedimientos e invasiones de la hasbará se actualizan a velocidad de vértigo —con esa celeridad que hacen posibles los posibles en cantidades millonarias y el control efectivo, indiscutible, de grandes instancias.
But we have to fight with the weapons that apply to the battlefields in which we're engaged. And the most important ones are social media.
And the most important purchase that is going on right now is…Tik Tok. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it can be consequential.
And what's the other one that's most important? X! …so we have to talk to Elon. He's not an enemy. He's a friend. We should talk to him. Now, if we can get those two things, we get a lot. And I could go on on other things, but that's not the point right now.
We have to fight the fight, okay? To give direction to the Jewish people and give direction to our non-Jewish friends, or those who could be our friends.
Según WikiLeaks, dichos “influencers” estadounidenses están cobrando hasta algo más de 7.000 dólares por publicación proisraelí.
Se supo gracias a una solicitud presentada bajo la Ley de Registro de Agentes Extranjeros (Foreign Agents Registration Act - Department of Justice, FARA).
A su amparo, Bridges Partners LLC, que actúa en nombre del gobierno israelí, repartió más de 900.000 dólares para reclutar y capacitar a más de una docena de influencers estadounidenses: cobran por publicar hasbará siguiendo las instrucciones de “influencers” israelíes.
Pueden acceder y leer la información en inglés. El proyecto incluye:
- Un contrato de 6 millones de dólares con Clock Tower X LLC, empresa dirigida por Brad Parscale, director de campaña de Donald Trump en 2016 y asesor principal en 2020, para ejecutar campañas de hasbará en TikTok, YouTube, Instagram y podcasts.
- Según documentos FARA recientemente presentados, la estrategia de la campaña incluye intentos de manipular algoritmos e influir en sistemas de IA como ChatGPT y Google Gemini, saturando las fuentes de datos con contenido proisraelí, con objeto de orientar los resultados y las narrativas en internet a favor de Israel. Los documentos mencionan al Estado de Israel como el principal extranjero con financiación canalizada a través del gigante publicitario Havas Media.
Hace casi un mes, el 21.09.2025, The Jerusalem Post había revelado los nombres de los 6 multimillonarios judíos estadounidenses que, a la chita callando, se han convertido en la columna vertebral de la financiación de Israel en tiempos de genocidio. Una aguerrida armadura financiera:
— Jan Koum ($17,6 mil millones. Cf. Forbes): de origen ucraniano, cofundador de WhatsApp, es un “megadonante silencioso”.
— Michael Dell ($140,6 mil millones; el gasto público en Educación en España, en 2023, fue de 67.937,9 millones de euros): Director ejecutivo de Dell Technologies, dispone de su Fundación Michael and Susan Dell para estos negocios. Donó 15 millones de dólares para proyectos de educación, caudillismo juvenil y tecnología en Israel y el extranjero durante el genocidio de Gaza.
— Bill Ackman ($9,4 mil millones): Gestor de fondos de cobertura.
El periodista Max Blumenthal explicó:
“Charlie Kirk estaba empezando a cambiar de actitud e [invitó a su Student Action Summit, Tampa, Florida, julio de 2025] a Tucker Carlson, no sólo para hablar de cómo Jeffrey Epstein posiblemente era un agente del Mossad, sino para pedir que se despojara de la ciudadanía a los judíos estadounidenses que habían luchado por Israel. Y denunció a Bill Ackman, uno de los multimillonarios sionistas más influyentes de EEUU, un imitador de Netanyahu, que había estado manipulando e intimidando a Harvard para que se sometiera. Su dinero logró que la rectora Claudine Gay fuera destituida. Tucker Carlson se burló de Bill Ackman, tildándolo de estafador financiero, y cuestionó el origen de su dinero. El público vitoreaba y disfrutaba de aquel espectáculo.”
— Marc Benioff ($8,9 mil millones): Presidente de Salesforce, propietario de Time Magazine, compra startups israelíes. Ha donado a United Hatzalah, un servicio de socorro que fue utilizado, como Zaka, para difundir aberraciones sobre el 7 de octubre. El director de UH, Eli Beer, fue a una recaudación de fondos de la Coalición Judía republicana y allí soltó una serie de bárbaras patrañas estilo Cochav Elkayam-Levy o Yossi Landau. Los sionistas llevan décadas acusando a los palestinos de todo tipo de espantos que ellos sí han cometido fehacientemente —por ejemplo, ya en Deir Yassin, el 9 de abril de 1948, más de un mes antes incluso de la existencia del estado de Israel. Cada acusación sionista es una confesión. Lean la vomitiva difamación de Eli Beer, otro que vio "con sus propios ojos", como Joe Biden y tantos otros:
“Vi con mis propios ojos a una mujer embarazada, de cuatro meses. Entraron en su casa, delante de sus hijos, le abrieron el vientre, sacaron al bebé, apuñalaron a un bebé diminuto delante de ella y luego le dispararon delante de su familia. Y luego mataron al resto de los niños. Vi niños pequeños decapitados: ¡no sabíamos qué cabeza pertenecía a cada niño! Vimos a un bebé en un… ¡horno! ¡Lo metieron, estos cabrones metieron a estos bebés en un horno y lo pusieron al horno! Encontramos al niño unas horas después.”
— Larry Ellison ($370,9 mil millones): Lleva de vacaciones a Naziyahu a su isla privada en Hawai. Incluso le ofreció en 2021 un muy lucrativo empleo en Oracle, gigante tecnológico del que es cofundador. Genocidófilo, Larry Ellison financia a Friends of the IDF [16,6 millones de dólares en 2017, la mayor donación privada en su historia en ese momento] o la ciudad colonial de Sderot. Ha donado o prometido al menos 257 millones de libras esterlinas (más de 342 millones de dólares al cambio de hoy) al Instituto Tony Blair, que ha enrolado a más de 900 empleados en al menos 45 países (sigan el enlace anterior: contiene abundante y excelente información firmada por The Dissident, el 30.09.2025). Ellison se convirtió en septiembre en la 2ª persona con un patrimonio de más de 400 mil millones de dólares, gracias a la subida de sus acciones de Oracle por mor de la inteligencia artificial, esa enriquecedora guía de almas cándidas.
— Michael Bloomberg ($109,4 mil millones): Fundador de Bloomberg y exalcalde de Nueva York, ha donado más de 100 millones de shekels a causas israelíes.
En fin, el 25 de septiembre había cobrado forma ese movimiento estratégico glosado, como veíamos más arriba, por el primer ministro de EEUU, digo de Israel, B: N.: su lacayo Trump había firmado “una orden ejecutiva” de obediencia plena que aprobaba la transferencia de TikTok por 14.000.000.000 de dólares a "propiedad estadounidense" (al servicio de Israel).
Inciso: Nazinyahu está acostumbrado a que sus deseos sean convertidos en realidad por dirigentes y multimillonarios de EEUU, como ocurre especialmente desde la publicación de su incendiaria bazofia “Fighting the Terrorism” (1.01.1995), obra en la que un genocida explica al imperio cómo hacer para acabar con cualquier resistencia, asunto al que el imperio se aplicó de inmediato mezclando tradición y captura [cf. el general Wesley Clark en 2007]. Los dirigentes sionistas fijan objetivos, dianas, y los hechos posteriores prueban que sus designios son religiosamente cumplidos por la divinidad. Para muchos patriotas estadounidenses de extrema derecha, empieza a ser demasiado humillante.
En este caso, multimillonarios sionistas estadounidenses, entre ellos el mentado Larry Ellison, junto con las firmas de capital riesgo Silver Lake y Andreessen Horowitz [fundada en 2009 por Marc Andreessen y Ben Horowitz], poseerán una participación del 50% en TikTok U.S.
Digamos de paso que la actual directora ejecutiva de Oracle, la empresa de Ellison, es la multimillonaria israelí Safra Ada Catz.
Digamos también que, en julio, TikTok contrató a la exsoldado de las Fuerzas Genocidas de Israel Erica Mindel como "Gerente de Políticas para el Discurso de Odio". Tal vez piense usted que el "odio", en cuanto sentimiento, no delinque, pero el “odio” es oficialmente odiado y legalmente perseguido por fascistas y progres —estos utilizan el mismo lenguaje que los primeros porque todos hablan la jerga antipensamiento que destilan laboratorios de agenda mental y lingüística muy GOPAC, que son cualquier cosa menos progres.
Los usuarios de TikTok (podríamos añadir Youtube, Instagram, Facebook y demás campeones de la Libertad) perciben y denuncian enormidades de censura con respecto al contenido crítico con Israel, e incluso se han prohibido publicaciones que destacan la nueva propiedad de TikTok, quizás porque el saber ocupa lugar.
Y es que resulta imposible distinguir conceptualmente los términos plutocracia, “democracia”, sionismo, capitalismo, “soberanía” y “libertad” en la dura realidad capitalista-atlantista-sionista —y conviene que eso, y el control de cerebros y vidas que ello supone, no se noten tanto.
Además, los usuarios han notado cambios en la aplicación de marras: ahora, por ejemplo, TikTok les lanza advertencias cuando buscan expresiónes como "USS Liberty" [busquen USS Liberty aquí].
Inciso: yo he obtenido auténticas perlas preguntando por ciertos asuntos a la Inteligencia Artificial, cuyos negacionismo o sectarismo me han recordado a los de cualquier periódico de extremo centro.
“I also wanna point out that we have a major, major, major…, generational problem. In all the polling that I’ve seen, ADL’s polling, ICC’s polling, independent polling suggests this is not a left or right gap, folks. The issue of U.S. support for Israel is not left and right, it is young and old, this is numbers of young people who think that Hamas’s, you know, massacre was justified is shockingly and terrifyingly high. And so, we rrrrrrrreally have a TikTok problem, the Gen-Z problem, that our community needs to put the same brains that gave us Taglit, the same brains all this other amazing innovations… need to put our energy towards this. Like… fast, because again, like we’ve been chasing this left-right divide. It’s the wrrrrrong game.
The real game is the next generation and the Hamas, and their accomplices.
The useful idiots in the West [aquí pueden seguir a unos encantadores Useful Idiots] are falling in line in ways that are terrifying.
The last thing I’ll just say: we saw a dramatic change in the language of the activists here in the America on October the 8th. The language of groups that we’ve long tracked to have long been problematic, like Student for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voices for Peace, they flipped like this and went to like Iranian Propaganda. The language I could show you from their toolkits, because they’re endless in their groups, we saw this again on October the 8th, it was that fast… like the language in their toolkits was all about the ‘Zionist entity’, and lots of other language that we recognize from Iranian Propaganda.”
Dicho y hecho. TikTok es otra “captura” sionista. Las colonizaciones pueden lograrse con armas, compras, lenguaje… pero siempre con pasta.
Según el ex agente de la CIA John Chris Kiriakou, a quien las autoridades norteamericanas mandaron a prisión por revelar el programa de torturas de la agencia, los espías israelíes se pasean por las instituciones de EEUU como Pedro por su casa.
Para Kiriakou, a quien los israelíes quisieron reclutar, como él mismo confiesa, cuando trabajaba para la CIA, no es cierto el eslogan trumpiano de “America first” (América, primero), porque en política exterior lo único que cuenta es “Israel first”.
Es un escándalo, explica, que el AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), grupo de presión sionista especialmente activo en el Congreso y los medios de comunicación, no esté obligado a registrarse en EEUU como “agente extranjero”, igual que han de hacer otros lobbies.
Últimamente el AIPAC ha publicado un spot publicitario en las televisiones de aquel país en el que se presenta como una organización patriótica que lucha por promover los intereses norteamericanos y contribuye así a la seguridad tanto de EEUU como de Israel.
AIPAC no oculta que una de sus actividades más importantes es ayudar con sus millones a los políticos que aspiran a ser elegidos para el Congreso o el Senado de EEUU y en combatir a quienes critican a Israel como el cada vez más popular candidato a la alcaldía neoyorquina Zoran Mamdani.
Según el periodista Joe Lauria, director del Consorcio para el Periodista Independiente (Consortium News), preocupado por el alejamiento de tantos jóvenes evangélicos del Estado judío, el lobby israelí lleva a cabo últimamente una campaña de propaganda y control psicológico en las iglesias de esa denominación cristiana, tradicionalmente próxima al judaísmo.
Al mismo tiempo “bombardea” a los jóvenes norteamericanos con mensajes pro israelíes en las distintas redes sociales en un intento de revertir la actual tendencia de alejamiento del sionismo.
Según el antes citado ex denunciante Kiriakou, no quedan ya entre los principales medios de comunicación de Estados Unidos, ya sea en la prensa escrita o en las televisiones, medios que se abstengan de censurar las informaciones relacionadas con Israel.
Pero igual de preocupante, explica, es lo que sucede en otros países, por ejemplo, el Reino Unido, donde un gobierno laborista ha promulgado una llamada “ley antiterrorista” que ilegaliza a grupos antifascistas y, entre otras cosas, permite la detención o la prohibición de entrada en el país, de periodistas críticos con Israel.
Efectivamente, el AIPAC está en plena campaña de captación de afectos y ha lanzado un vídeo lujoso y patético para demostrar que son muy “americanos” y para insistir en lo fundamental que para EEUU resulta apoyar a Israel.
AIPAC has launched a new ad campaign to rebrand itself as an “American organization” focused on advancing U.S. interests.
The group says its five million members are all American citizens, representing both Republicans and Democrats.
AIPAC insists that supporting Israel is not just good policy, but good politics.
En fin, sigan el asterisco...
* A modo de breve ejemplo, durante las elecciones de 2024, el lobby israelí AIPAC aflojó al menos 45,2 millones de dólares para asegurarse la elección de candidatos al Congreso de EEUU, récord hasta ahora en la plutocracia imperial, según informe de Sludge.
349 senadores y congresistas de ambos partidos, el 65 % del Congreso, fueron untados por el AIPAC o sus comités de acción política (super PAC).
El presidente republicano de la Cámara de Representantes, Mike Johnson, recibió al menos 654.000 dólares, mientras que el líder de la minoría de la Cámara, el demócrata Hakeem Jeffries, recibió al menos 933.000 dólares.
El AIPAC organizó el acoso a dos miembros demócratas de la Cámara —los representantes Cori Bush, de Missouri, y Jamaal Bowman, de Nueva York— por pedir un alto el fuego en Gaza.
El AIPAC gastó 20 millones de dólares para dopar las campañas de sus oponentes en las primarias, los empleados del Sionismo Wesley Bell y George Latimer, que desbancaron (nunca mejor dicho) a Bush y Bowman.
Es un aumento considerable del presupuesto de sobornos del AIPAC respecto a 2022, cuando ascendió a 13 millones de dólares. El grupo de presión colonial disparó las mordidas debido a lo que se percibía como una oposición humana generalizada al genocidio desbraguetado de Israel en Gaza. En las actuales circunstancias, sufrió una inflación el precio de las voces contra un alto el fuego en Gaza. Es fascinante: Israel controla a más congresistas y senadores estadounidenses que el Ciro el Grande vigente. Israel no es el Estado 51 de la Unión, no: más bien el Congreso y el Senado yanquis son sucursales de la Knésset. Y la Casa Blanca, una oficina bien remunerada del gobierno de Nazinyahu.
¿Cuánto han gastado los sionistas en untar a Trump y Harris? Es difícil proporcionar una cifra exacta debido a la variedad de “donaciones” y a sus diversos canales. Pueden estar ocultas bajo nombres de individuos o PAC inyectantes de Trump y Harris, sin que necesariamente estén reconocidos directamente como sionistas. Eso sí, entre filántropos individuales, PACs y otras organizaciones, los sobornos sionistas a las últimas campañas presidenciales de Donald Trump y Kamala Harris se cuentan por decenas de millones de dólares.
Los Adelson, entre el difunto y su viuda, entregaron a Trump y los republicanos entre 2016 y 2021 más de 424 millones de dólares, y al menos 100 millones para la campaña de 2024. Pero es imposible calcular el total: pueden apoyar con “donaciones” a "Save America" o a otros comités de acción fascista cuyos importes desconocemos.
Dans un monde de plus en plus divisé, notre mission n'est pas de diviser les gens par la peur et la fiction, mais de les rassembler par l'empathie et les preuves.
Beaucoup trop de journalistes se calment dans leur bulle de privilèges et de pouvoir, dialoguant entre eux et avec la prétendue classe politique, au lieu de servir ceux qu'ils sont censés informer.
DDN est l'antithèse de l'ego, de la personnalité et de la supériorité morale. Nous privilégions les personnes, les idées, les preuves et la communauté.
Si vous vous sentez abandonné, négligé et sous-représenté, DDN trouvera des moyens créatifs de vous atteindre, de vous responsabiliser et de vous mobiliser.
DDN peut se résumer à la définition de H.L. Mencken des objectifs du bon journalisme : « réconforter les affligés et affliger les confortables ».
Contrairement à la plupart des médias financés par des milliardaires ou des États-nations, DDN est financé par vous : nos téléspectateurs.
Alors que nous entrons dans une période de plus en plus incertaine et dangereuse, le besoin d’un journalisme citoyen indépendant et courageux, libre de l’influence des milliardaires, des bellicistes, des entreprises et des États-nations, n’a jamais été aussi important.
Chez DDN, la parole et les mots justes regagnent leurs droits face au simulacre. Parmi les collaborateurs/collaboratrices de cette plateforme en ligne, il y a journalistes, podcasteurs/podcasteuses, gens du commun, survivants de l'Holocauste nazi, chanteurs.euses et rappeurs.euses, écrivain.e.s, acteurs/actrices...
Dont Lowkey. Né à Londres le 23 mai 1986, d'un père anglais et d'une mère irakienne, Kareem Dennis, plus connu sous son nom de scène Lowkey, est un rappeur et activiste politique britannique. Il analyse ici le contexte et la réalité dont il faut tenir compte vis-à-vis du soi-disant 'plan de Paix' trumpiste ou 'accord' de Gaza.
TRANSCRIPTION (La transcription et tous les liens et contenus entre crochets sont de mon cru) :
Lowkey [Rapper & Journalist]: A deal has been announced by US President Donald Trump to bring a cessation of Israel's genocidal military campaign in Gaza. But let's be clear, Israel has broken every single ceasefire agreement it has ever had with any state ever. This will be no different.
However, what has happened during this period of time is Israel has brought itself directly into an antagonistic conflict with the vast majority of humanity through its genocidal actions in Gaza.
When people are seeing, on a daily basis, children killed on their phones, they have gone away to try and understand what could the cause of this be, what is the ideological underpinning of all of this killing and murder.
And that has led them to the ideology of Zionism.
In the United States, you see stalwart supporters of Israel on the right-wing side of the equation turning against Israel and turning against Zionism in large numbers.
— Charlie Kirk [talking to Ben Shapiro] : Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says, because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years.
— Joe Rogan: What they've done to Gaza is fucking insane. It's insane. And if you can't see that, if you can't say that and you all your response is Israel has the right to defend itself, like what are you talking about? Against what? Children?
— Theo Von [This Past Weekend / Theodor Capitani von Kurnatowski III, who describes his heritage as Polish and Nicaraguan, grew up in small-town of Louisiana]: I feel like America's just like… it feels like we're just owned by Israel, you know? And we just never knew it.
— I thought we own them.
— Theo Von: That's what I thought.
— Uh-oh.
— Tucker Carlson: BB's running, this is a fact. I'm not guessing about this. He's running around the Middle East, his region, and his own country and telling people, point blank! just stating it, “I control the United States. I control Donald Trump.” It's too humiliating! I can't handle that! [Cf. Glenn Greenwald, Tucker Carlson on Charlie Kirk Assassination Fallout, Free Speech, Foreign Policy, and More, 24.09.2025. On Rumble]
Israel has woken the world to the horrors of the Zionist project practiced upon Palestinians and people will never go to sleep again.
But, also, the story of Palestine is not simply a story of unchecked Zionist power. Actually, it's the story of a refusal to die. The Palestinians have not been defeated. In fact, they are victorious.
Palestine was supposed to die in 1948. It didn't.
Palestine was supposed to die across the last two years in Gaza. It didn't.
The Palestinian resistance has taken its place alongside the Vietcong in Vietnam, the French resistance in World War II, the Warsaw ghetto uprising, the heroes of the Irish who refused to bow to 800 years of British colonialism.
And all free people of the world, the majority of humanity, support the Palestinians right to armed resistance as an occupied people.
So, what do we see today?
We see Spain, which has a history of warm relations with Israel, now engaging in a full arms embargo with the Zionist entity.
You have Greece and Italy brought to a full standstill by unions in those countries refusing to cooperate with government diktats vis-à-vis the Zionist entity.
You see the majority of states in the world taking positions in the United Nations which are at odds with Israel.
The victory that this represents is that Israel's genocide is having to disguise itself and hide in bureaucratic violence.
It is no longer able to pursue this genocidal war in the naked way it was before and with the support of key propagandists that it could rely on for many decades previously.
When you look at this recent peace deal, what has been agreed upon is not the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. Instead, what you have is the vague promise of an agreement by Donald Trump acting as the guarantor of this deal that Israel will withdraw to particular points within Gaza, the specifics to be agreed upon at a later date.
In addition to the release of 20 Israeli prisoners of war and captives within Gaza, in exchange, there should be around 2,000 Palestinian prisoners released with several hundred of them, those who received life sentences.
What you also have is Israel now obligated to allow the delivery of around 600 trucks of aid daily.
Implicit within that is the acknowledgment that Israel has been using food as a weapon of war. That is a key characteristic of genocide.
The reverberations of Gaza —and Israel's genocidal campaign there— will be felt for decades to come.
Those reverberations have entailed the changing of laws in other countries, the imprisoning of 33 political prisoners in this country [the UK] now for their refusal to allow genocide to take place on their watch.
The arresting of blind protesters for holding placards with words on them.
The arresting of a young man for holding a magazinewhich has these now criminal words [“I oppose genocide – I support ‘Palestine Action’”] printed on the cover of it.
This is the authoritarianism that Israel's genocide has unleashed on the rest of the world.
We have seen heroic support from billions of people across the world to the people of Gaza.
We have seen people from wide and far cling onto the hands of those in Gaza and refuse to let them go.
But what we have also seen is an unprecedented servility among the political classes of the world who have been materially involved in this genocide in Gaza.
Do not allow them to rewrite history.
Already, you have Israel lobby-backed politicians like [fantoche] Jon [Jonathan] Ashworth coming on TV and trying to claim:
— Jon Ashworth: “And I've wanted to see a ceasefire for 2 years. I think there is a role that the Labour government has played in this as well. Remember, Labour has done what it can diplomatically.”
The UK has been a party to this genocide by sending RAF spy flights, R1 Shadow planes, over the top of Gaza, on an almost daily basis, even in the hours around the killing of three former UK military personnel in Gaza.
Over the next few months, they will try and tell you that the war is over.
Genocide in new clothes. They will try to assure you that there are legal processes playing out to establish the facts of what did and what didn't happen in Gaza.
Do not allow them to treadmill-ize you and to nullify your aversion to this human suffering.
Do not allow them to demobilize you.
Now is not the time to retreat. Now is the time to escalate.
Over the next few months, they will try and tell you that the war is over.
Genocide in new clothes. They will try to assure you that there are legal processes playing out to establish the facts of what did and what didn't happen in Gaza.
Do not allow them to treadmill-ize you and to nullify your aversion to this human suffering.
Do not allow them to demobilize you.
Now is not the time to retreat. Now is the time to escalate.
[Le peuple palestinien a plus que jamais besoin de nous.]
Ondřej Dostál, Fidías Panayiótou, Clare Daly et Andrew Lowenthal se sont réunis le 14 juin 2025 —si je ne m’abuse— autour d’une table du Parlement européen lors d’une séance très éclairante organisée par l’europarlementaire tchèque Ondřej Dostál, avec la collaboration du jeune europarlementaire chypriote Fidías Panayiótou.
Voici —extraite et présentée par APT [APT News]— l’intervention de l'ancienne eurodéputée et militante irlandaise Clare Daly, qui met à nu la sinistre réalité des politiques européennes dites effrontément de « défense de la démocratie ».
Qualifiée de « propagandiste russe » simplement pour avoir dit la vérité —à savoir, primo, que la guerre en Ukraine était une guerre par procuration menée par l'OTAN contre la Russie ; secundo, que les citoyens européens souffraient davantage que l'économie russe des sanctions imposées par l'Europe à la Russie—, Daly s'en prend au cadre de désinformation de l'Union européenne, aux « sanctions hybrides » et à la répression systématique de la dissidence.
Des journalistes propalestiniens confrontés à des interdictions de voyager et à des gels d'actifs aux citoyens sanctionnés pour avoir remis en question les mesures liées à la COVID ou les politiques de l'OTAN, Daly révèle comment les mots et les idées sont traités comme des armes et comment l'UE réduit de plus en plus au silence les voix qui remettent en question son discours.
« Si c'est eux aujourd'hui, ce sera vous demain », prévient Daly, soulignant l'urgence pour les citoyens de s'organiser, de protéger la liberté d'expression et de demander des comptes aux dirigeants européens.
Regardez-la expliquer comment les « sanctions hybrides », la répression politique et le contrôle des médias remodèlent la démocratie en Europe, et pourquoi chacun devrait y prêter attention avant qu'il ne soit trop tard.
Sujets clés : Politique de désinformation de l'UE, sanctions hybrides, liberté d'expression, Clare Daly, reportages pro-palestiniens, Parlement européen, démocratie menacée, allégations de propagande russe, censure en Europe.
TRANSCRIPTION (Transcription, liens et contenus entre crochets sont de mon cru) :
Ondřej Dostál: And now it is a good time to introduce Clare Daly. It is not necessary, because everybody in this house already knows Clare Daly.
She is from Ireland, a campaigner, activist, trade unionist who served as a local councillor from 2000 and then as a national MEP in Ireland from 2010.
And she already had a formidable reputation of an opposition legislator winning many policy victories and taking the Irish government to account.
During COVID and during the past ten years in Parliament, you held European bureaucracy to account with a great success, and I hope you will tell us more about the nice or less nice things which happen here in Europe.
Thank you, Clare.
Clare Daly: Well, thanks very much. I suppose first and foremost to everybody for being here. Some old faces, some new.
But a special thanks to Ondřej for organizing and for Fidias for being here, because we meet at a very dangerous juncture in world history, when very few people at European leadership level, either in member states or here, in these European Union bodies, understand the scale of the repression which is undermined and ongoing at the moment, let alone are prepared to do anything about it.
So, we are extremely grateful to Ondřej for organizing this event and we're very lucky that he is here.
[Fidias: I give it up for Ondřej!]
In this building, a couple of weeks ago, downstairs, the Irish commissioner, the main man, Michael McGrath is his name, he's responsible for rule of law in the European Union, and he addressed the plenary session of the European Parliament.
And he told MEPs on that day that democracy is the founding value of the European Union, together with respect for rule of law and fundamental rights.
He told them that freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and association, and the right to participate in democratic life are enshrined in EU treaties, the
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, EU legislation and common constitutional traditions of member states.
And he then went on and told them that citizens should be able to form their own opinions in a public space where there is access to reliable information from a plurality of sources with different views, which can be expressed, where political discussions can be confronted and where it's possible to disagree with one another.
Powerful stuff indeed.
Who in hell would disagree with that?
But it's so brazenly out of touch with reality that I think many people would have found themselves scratching their head and going, "Where is this utopia that he's talking about?"
And none more so than myself and my colleague, former MEP Mick Wallace, who's also here today, who know the commissioner well. And we knew him from our time in the Irish Parliament, and he never stood out then as a crusader for democracy.
In fact, he was a member of successive governments which were entirely actually undemocratic in their nature.
And his newfound interest in democracy actually was kind of particularly uncharacteristic, until you looked at the title of the debate that he was introducing, and it was called The Hungarian government's drift to Russian-style repression, legislative threats to freedom of expression and democratic participation.
In other words, in layman's terms, this is the ongoing standoff between the centrist parties which have ruled Europe for decades now, who call themselves liberal, and the so-called illiberal regimes, on the other hand, led by Hungary's president Victor Orbán.
And then, McGrath's words make sense, because the real reason why the EU leadership stands so staunchly in defending free speech in Hungary is that it's speech that they agree with.
And it's an entirely different matter if you have speech which they don't agree with.
And that is the context of the European Union's disinformation policy. It's the fundamental point that people have to understand.
It has nothing to do with democracy. It's a tactic that they use for people they don't like. And first and foremost, and most importantly, it is to clamp down on dissent on those who would have the audacity to challenge those people who are in power.
And so, we have this fable of the EU's official platform for its disinformation obsession that our democracies are under attack from malign foreign actors who want to spread disinformation to undermine our societies and our governments, to influence our elections, to put us all against each other and break down our unity.
And to stand up to this terrible threat, we have to defend our democracy —by cracking down on disinformation and promoting unity in the European Union. It's absolute and utter nonsense, from start to finish!
Of course, foreign interference exists.
Of course, states have the right to defend themselves from outside influence seeking to undermine them for the benefit of themselves.
But Russian bots didn't sway European elections.
Their outcomes were very firmly determined by domestic matters.
Look at… we all know that all states do propaganda. But what I found, when I was a member of the INGE committee —which was the [Special] committee on foreign interference in all democratic processes in the European Union, including disinformation, which I was the coordinator on the left group for three very long years, I can tell you—, but from my experience on that committee, the problem wasn't propaganda that actually came from external sources or foreign governments.
The problem was narratives, domestically, that they didn't agree with.
And I suppose I have to be honest now and confess at this stage that I would say that, wouldn't I? Because I'm actually a Russian propagandist, believe it or not, according to a Ukrainian hit list or whatever.
And the two reasons why I'm a Russian propagandist is I said two things:
One, that the war in Ukraine was a NATO proxy war [Marco Rubio agrees].
And the second, that the people of Europe were suffering more than the Russian economy from the sanctions that Europe had imposed on Russia.
...on the pauperizing reality for European citizens crushed under the cost of living issue… rather than discussing those issues with me and taking responsibility, as the European leaders who brought them in, it's much easier to smear me as a Russian agent or a Russian propagandist, and that is what the European Union's disinformation policy is designed to do: to silence anyone who questions their narrative, the official narrative.
And to do that, they even have a toolkit to whip us into line, to suppress certain kinds of speech and to manage the kinds of information that are allowed to circulate in our society.
So, if you question their COVID policy, you're an anti-vaxxer.
If you criticize Israel's genocide, you're anti-Semitic.
And if you argue for peace in the war in Ukraine, well, then, you're a Kremlin stooge or something like that.
That's basically what's going on here. And how the European Union is going to deal with that disinformation comes under the ‘Defence of Democracy’ package, they used to call it, when I was here.
I mean, did you ever? Like, it's just pathetic.
It's even been rebranded worse now. It's The European Democracy Shield [un truc carrément 1984 !].
I mean, where do these people get off?
And the committee is even called the European Democracy Shield Committee! And you literally could not make this stuff up.
And the whole basis of it is, is that ideas are now dangerous and they pose a fundamental threat to our democracy allegedly.
The public sphere, the media, social media, where our society learns about itself and public opinion is shaped: this is now a battleground.
Words and ideas are weapons. And the European liberals are here to save us from that, to defend us from these outrageous attacks.
And let's be honest about it, despite that fact that this has accelerated massively since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, there has always been a program of repression by the European political establishment. And up until now, the toolkit has been kind of a soft form of repression really. They had a number of tactics —you can read about them in the INGE report, which is the report of the old committee that I was on—, but the approach at that time was kind of to do stuff like… drown out dissenting narratives with propaganda in support of the official EU narrative.
Now, when we do it, it's not propaganda, of course. It's called ‘Strategic Communications’, because we're the good guys, but that was what they used to do there. Then, they sought to co-opt social media platforms to derank narratives they don't like. And then, they've pumped funding into these so-called fact-checking organizations to police online discourse.
Now, we warned about this. They even toyed with the idea of making contradicting governments a crime. Did you ever? They had to back away from that one because that would be even a little bit too far to go, and you'd have to bring in legislation and a court case to deal with that.
And this is where the European Union 17th set of sanctions comes into play , because what you have here is sanctions targeting disinformation, ‘Hybrid Sanctions’, they call them [Council of the EU, Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine: EU agrees 17th package of sanctions, 20.05.2025].
The first package was in December, we've had two more since then. And our great High Representative [for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and chair of the Foreign Affairs Council Kaja Kallas] lauded these sanctions under the guide when she said, and she sternly vowed, that “those who enable Russia face severe consequences”.
[Cf. “This round of sanctions on Russia is the most wide-sweeping since the start of the war, together with new hybrid, human rights, and chemical weapons-related sanctions. In this 17th package, we include Surgutneftegas - a Russian oil giant - as well as almost 200 vessels in Russia’s shadow fleet. While Putin feigns interest in peace, more sanctions are in the works. Russia’s actions and those who enable Russia face severe consequences. The longer Russia persists with its illegal and brutal war, the tougher our response will be.”
Kaja Kallas, High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and chair of the Foreign Affairs Council]
Now, what was this disinformation and who were these people?
Well, this is where it gets interesting, because this is Russian disinformation. Now, a few of them were actually Russians, but there was also a German blogger, an EU citizen, who was sanctioned. And there was a Turkish citizen who was a valid EU resident who was also sanctioned. He lives in Germany.
And let's look at this case for a minute —and I hope I'm not labouring it, but we have time here and we have to use it to really spell out what is going on in this so-called European Union of ‘Democracy in action’, as we took our pictures outside, this sign outside of here.
Because, in that case, we have a person who's been subjected to an asset freeze and a travel ban on the basis that he was systematically spreading information which the EU said was false.
Now, we don't know what that information was, because nobody got to see it. But they said he disseminated the narratives of Hamas, but again, what narratives they were, we don't know.
They said he created discord and that he provided pro-Palestinian protesters, who are described as anti-Israel rioters, with an exclusive media platform.
Now, think about this.
This sounds like the type of action that millions of European Union citizens agree with, trying to force their governments to end complicity with the genocide in Gaza.
In fact, many people believe there should be a lot more discord created in Europe to deal with this.
But even if you don't agree with that, you have to ask yourself the question, how in God's name is any of this linked with Russia? That's a tough one to sort of. Well, I'll tell you the answer to that one, because they have it.
Seemingly, pro-Palestinian action undermines the stability and security of the European Union, or one or more of its member states. And sure, that's what the Russians are all about. We all know that.
So, therefore, pro-Palestinian activity is supporting Russia and you can be sanctioned.
Now, I'm not being flippant about this. This is the actual reality of this. I don't know the facts of the case. Nobody does because it hasn't been published.
But what it looks like is a person who was involved, nothing to do with Russia, who was documenting German police crackdown on Palestinian protests and in retaliation, the German authorities slapped them with an EU sanction.
And if it can happen to them today, it can happen to you tomorrow.
It is almost unbelievable, but you have to get on that page to realize the seriousness of what is at stake here.
Now, in democracies, we're supposed to have a rule of law, don't we? God almighty, you hear about it off and on in this place. You think it was their bread and butter, but that means, if you want to punish somebody, you have to charge them with a crime. That crime has to be defined in law. Once you charge them, due process has to come in. They have the right to know the charges against them. They have a right to see the evidence. They have a right to a trial in an open court, a right to defend themselves, a right to free speech that they can use there. And then the state can only impose a sanction when they've carefully considered all of those things beyond reasonable doubt. Not anymore.
That's gone now.
Depriving people of their rights based on rumours and innuendo is exactly what these hybrid sanction packages are about. It's as simple as that.
I wouldn't normally be in the habit of quoting Politico, but you're lucky, we'll break a habit soon as we're here.
When they even saw some of the dossiers and they said one of the packets that had somebody sanctioned was 10 open-source links with varying degrees of reliability. Another was nine, another was four. Articles in publications like The Financial Times and Reuters were heavily relied on, badly translated, probably AI translated articles from Russian and Ukrainian sources.
One was a lifestyle magazine affiliated with the Russian government, but it generally talked about cookery rather than actually news and all this sort of stuff.
There was even a woman who was sanctioned for performing a concert in Crimea. I kid you not.
I mean, this wouldn't pass muster in a classroom, not to mind a courtroom, but this is what's been talked about as evidence in the European Union, evidence of Russian interference, no oversight.
Civil servants draw up a list, which is on the advice of the commission and member states, and then, 27 EU foreign ministers go behind a closed door and vote to sanction you or not.
And if you're targeted by an EU sanction, you don't hear the charges against you. You don't get a trial. You don't get a right to defence. You basically… the first thing you find out about this is a letter coming in your door telling you that your bank accounts have been frozen and that you're banned from entering or leaving the country.
And the guy who was sanctioned in Germany [en fait. il en fut question de 3 : Alina Lipp, Thomas Röper et Hüseyin Doğru, fondateur de red. media], I'm just going to briefly read his account of that, because sometimes we bandy words around here about things like sanctions and they seem a bit depersonalized.
Well, what does that actually mean to a real person?
Well, this guy explained it and he said [Cf. Hüseyin Doğru, Berlin-based journalist, he reported on Palestine through his media outlet Red., until he was forced to shut it down. On May 20, 2025, the EU sanctioned Doğru for what it called his outlet’s links to Russia. But he says it’s because of his coverage of Palestine],
"I haven't been charged with anything. I haven't stood trial. I haven't been found guilty of any crime. I've no chance to defend myself, but the EU sanctioned me for my pro-Palestinian journalism and stripped me of my rights. I'm not allowed to buy food. I'm not allowed to buy medicine for my children. I'm not allowed to pay for my lawyer. I'm not allowed to leave the country I live in. I'm not allowed to enter the country I live in. I'm not allowed to get a job. I'm not allowed to make payments. I'm not allowed to receive payments. I'm not allowed to pay my rent. Every single time for every single case, I have to submit a file and ask permission. And then, I have to wait several days for approval.”
And in case any of you are feeling a bit sorry for him and think that you might send him a few bob just to help him out, well, I'd be very careful about that, because you too could then be sanctioned for the crime of circumventing a sanction from the European Union and you could find yourself on a sanctioned list as well.
Now, this kind of sounds like ‘tin pot’ sort of stuff, but this is democracy now in the European Union and it is the new repression as Ondřej calls it because we have ‘hybrid sanctions’ against EU citizens for exercising the very rights that Michael McGrath audited in these place buildings a number of weeks ago ‘has been enshrined in our constitutions here’.
So, what we see is —in their so-called battle between democracy and authoritarianism—, the European Union is becoming incredibly authoritarian in their actions.
It is an absolute abomination.
And every foreign minister who sat in that room and voted for those sanctions should be called to account by the members in this house.
And I really would urge MEPs who are here present to contact Michael McGrath and to make that point.
There really has to be a concerted effort —and we'll probably deal with it in the Q&A in a minute, and I know because I was there before him in the previous committee, I'd imagine life is very difficult for Fidias on the European Democracy Shield Committee—, but this has to be made, an issue there.
It has to be made an issue in the Civil Liberties Committee [LIBE].
And I really think members here should coordinate their work in that in terms of how it's going to be raised over the next period.
I think there's also a need for a really serious joint effort for members to take legal advice and to look into whether this is something that could be taken to the court of justice on the basis to the general threat to all EU citizens rights which exist from this.
Now, obviously, the problem with that is impunity —there's limits to what procedural challenges can achieve—, but if there's no push back on this, which is why this meeting is so important, then they're going to go further. There has to be broad political support built to challenge what's happening here.
You got to go from this and organize in your home countries to talk about this.
You've got to speak in your communities and tell people what's going on.
And that it's a threat to them and it's going to get worse.
Honestly, there is really a very small window left to do anything and it's crucial that we organize to do something before that window closes.
So, in conclusion, this is not just about speech. It's really about the fundamental right of expression, the most fundamental right we have, and tool we have, as citizens.
We have to be able to challenge our governments to change their policies.
But that's what's in the firing line now from all of this stuff. You mightn't care about whether someone was silenced for pro pro-Palestinian speech or whatever. That's not really important. You don't have to agree with the issues there, but you have to recognize the danger of what's going on here.
Because if it's them today, it's you tomorrow.
And tomorrow is already here.
When I was on the INGE committee for those three years, every single thing they didn't like, they called it Russian interference or Chinese interference or Iranian interference, didn't matter who it was.
So, it was anything.
Catalan independence movement, Russian interference.
The peace movement, Russian interference.
Eurocritical politics, you name it whatever it was, that's the name of the game here.
So, if you care about the ability to do opposition politics in Europe, you have to care about this issue.
And that's what this meeting here is about. It's a platform to begin to expose that. Because the first task in changing something is understanding that it's broken and giving information about that. And that's what we're doing here. And that's why this is important.
But it's not enough on its own. We've got to go from here, get the message out and organize for the right to hold our governments and our leadership into account and not be conned by the spurious ideas that what's happening in our societies, and the very valid criticisms that our citizens have, is somehow the product of infiltration from out, out external sources.
So, I leave you with that. Let's go out there and take them on because literally our right to survive is at stake here.
